Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

hahahaha No

It wasn't serious, yet it wasn't funny either, and it had very poor animation.

Next time put some effort into it.
You get a "1" for whatever you managed to put into this thing.

-SirBoredALot

Not funny, but decent animation.

There's nothing humorous about this at all.
Suitable for All Audiences is a lie. This is sex-based humor and it's awfully done as well. However the drawing was ok, the animation was a bit lacking, but overall you get some credit for at least animating it.
My advice for next time, put more thought into it, and make sure the "suitable for:" is credible.
That's really all there is to say about it.

-SirBoredALot

I expected more.

You basically just took the joke from Halo for Retards (different animation by flash-hounds) and changed the face and the lines, making it even less interesting.
The fact that it was Osama's face wasn't all that funny either. You say you worked hard on it right? It really doesnt seem that way when you watch it. There's little, if any animation and it doesnt last even 30 seconds.
And whats with the easter egg at the end? i dont really see how that's funny at all.
I dont mean to judge you, but the animation. But here's the thing, you've got say...more than 20 animations submitted, this being your most recent. That tells me that all your previous are either equally effortless or even less(if possible).
WIth how many animations you've submitted you really should try improving your tecniques rather than just submitting random vids because of boredom.

I'll give you a 1/10 for what little effort you did manage to put into it. Hopefully next time i rate your newest animation Ill have a reason to score you higher.

Keep in mind that im not hating on you, but im giving constructive criticism.
Try harder next time, it'll be worth it.
-SirBoredALot

Awesome Game

-----------80---3-----3---3---3---3-6 -1---0---5------82---9-6-1---1---1---
1---0---6--2---9---0---a---a---c-5-5-
5-5-1---1---a---a---2---9---0---c---a ---a---1---1---4---6-b--3---3---4-776 -------1---1-2-7-767-6-72787274a--4a-
-4a--436--72787274727872742-6-9--

----4-3---6-1---1---1---0---9-6-3---3 --82---2--89---9-66689---4-3---9-1---
0---886-9--5-5-1-1---b-0---1---8---8-
--c---a---a---9---0---7-7-7-7-6-5-5-1 -1---b-a---4---bbb6b------------6-1-6 -1-4-7-8-7-4-6--4a--4a--77647764-5753 57549-a---------6-768-724-888----

Those two are my personal favorites of the millions of songs i've managed to come up with.
It's an awesome game to say the least. The animation, even though it didnt matter near as much, was good enough, and the sound quality was fine.
The only minor problem was that on occasion one of the sounds would lag a bit can miss it's cue by a split second. It doesnt ruin the music, but it can get a little annoying.

Overall, it's an excellent game, one that i'll always be playing just for the hell of it. =P

-SirBoredALot-

Now THIS is original!

Hello Again!
I'm going to state up front my apologies for basically "spamming" a review on Candy Dance. I really should have just posted a linke and actually reviewed your song, but oh well!
I was hoping you would make something completely original, and you did!
Like I said, if you were to put effort into something completely original it would be incredible, and yes it is.
Thank you for bringing this to our listening ears.
Yay! Review time!
Okay, so the song overall is fantastic, catchy, and unforgettable to say the least. Effort was obviously put into it, and i love the hip-hop like beat on the drums around 0:35 that intros the actual techno drive of the rest of the song. Simply said, Black Rose does not get repetitive. It has something different in every segment of the song and personally I think it is 10 times better than Candy Dance.
When it comes to constructive criticism, i really can't offer much, if anything. I've listened to it about 6 times now and I really can't find anything to say needs fixing.
I am curious about why it is titled Black Rose, however. What gave you the inspiration for such a title? It may just be me, but a black rose usually symbols sadness or depression. This song is nowhere near that.
Like the title really matters as much as the song, though...

Fantastic, Andrea.

-SirBoredALot-

A little too critical critics.

AndreaDigita, you'll have to understand that there are a lot of different types of reviewers in NG. Here's what I've discerned from my own studies.

Spammers - Generally just say random things that have nothing to do with the song and/or advertise themselves or someone/something else instead of actually reviewing the song.

Ravers - These people go crazy over anything that is remotely good, and leave reviews like "OMG YOUR AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!" or "WOOT THIS STUFF IS TEH SH1T!!!"
Most of these reviews show that they liked your song and probably downloaded it. Their reviews might include misspellings of words or computer slang/l33t speak. I have nothing against these people personally, but most NGers think they should at least try to write a review.

Titlists - I used to do this. =P These are the people who type their whole review into the title of the actual review. An Example of what it would look like:

"woah that was awesome you rock"
by: Titlist-man
date: 23 minutes ago

:D

And that's what it would probably look like. They write appraisal in the title of the review, and leave a blank, or spam-like message in the actual review.

Simples - The people who just review to say you did a good job (or a bad job) are Simples. Basically what they do is like, or do not like, the song and review it simply to say "good job" or "not too good, sorry." Nothing really intense.

Passive Listeners - Including me, these are the people that actually review your SONG, and not your SKILL. These people focus on how the song sounded and the things they imagined while listening to it. They may or may not bring up the flaws, if there are any (In their opinion). Reviewers base their rating and reviews on the song, rather than the songwriter's actual skill.

Song Critics - There are two kinds of critics. Song critics are similar to Passive Listeners, however they do bring out the flaws in the song no matter what, and usually offer their constructive criticism for those flaws. I occasionally fall under this category as well.

Skill Critics - This type of critics are the people ignore the actual value of the song and base it on how good or bad the songwriter is. So if you're a good songwriter and make one not so good song, your screwed. Skill critics aren't listed under the Passive Listeners category because basically, they're arent usually passive. Anyone who says you have no skill just because a song was easily made isn't the most passive person.
(However, there are plenty of Skill Critics who are passive and will simply let you know that you need to actually try)

Rater or Hater - These people are the people that either 5 you or 0 you. Hence, Rate or Hate. They almost never rate anything in between, just going from song to song, listening a little maybe, and fiving or zeroing for the hell of it. This is the reason why you can't exactly trust the rating of a song on whether it is good or not. No matter what, at some point in their NG Audio experience everyone who submits anything will encounter a Rater or Hater. Rater's may review your song, in which case they'll probably fall under the Spammers or Ravers categories. Haters...most likely will not review your song. It's just the way they are.

So that's basically the Sum-Up of NG Audio Reviewers. Now for my actual review of your song.
I liked it, whether it wasn't original or not. You still made the song and it sounds good. People are saying you didnt even try, well it doesn't matter. Sometimes not even trying makes something good and that's all that matters. I think you should make something completely original, however, just because it would be THAT much better.
Be sure to respond please, I hate talking when nobody even acknowledges my words. =P

-SirBoredALot-

Wow. Just wow.

Yeah of course with your talent you'd expect to get this kind of review, but honestly, that was frikken amazing.
You are frikken amazing too.
are there any possible flaws to this song?
Probably not.

-SirBoredALot-